Rectosigmoid resection morbidity in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery.

This case series evaluated morbidity following rectosigmoid resection during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore. The data of 20 female patients with complications corresponding to the Clavien-Dindo classification was included; the patients received treatment between January 2016 and January 2021. The mean age was 45.05± 13.11 years. Complications were observed in 3 (15.0%) cases, i.e., urinary complications in 2 (66.7%), and intra-abdominal abscess in 1 (33.3%) case. Clavien-Dindo classification grade II was noted in 2 (66.7%), while grade III-B in 1 (33.3%) case. Surgical risk factors were noted as appendectomy in 6 (66.7%) cases, bowel resection in 1 (11.1%), left colectomy in 1 (11.1%), sigmoid colectomy in 1 (11.1%), and stoma formation in 11 (55.0%) cases. In this reported case series, significant complications were observed in women undergoing rectosigmoid resection as cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Background In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) surgery. Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Gynecologic Oncology Section of the Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. Using non-probability consecutive sampling technique, all patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery involving low anterior resection for EOC between January 2016 and January 2021 were included. Patients were assessed for LARS symptoms using the LARS score, along with its risk factors. Descriptive statistics, that is, continuous variables were expressed as the median and interquartile range, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The LARS score was categorized according to a two-tier model with "no or minor LARS" and "major LARS." Univariate analyses were performed by the chi-square tests providing odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to identify risk factors for major LARS. Results Overall, 95% of cases had LARS scores that fell in "no or minor LARS," while only 5% of cases had "major LARS." Univariate analyses relieved no statistically significant association between the occurrence of major LARS and any of the risk factors. Conclusions The prevalence of LARS was 5%, and no risk factors were associated with major LARS in our study population.